PENGARUH PERCEIVED SYSTEM KNOWLADGE TERHADAP JOB SATISFACTION YANG DIMEDIASI OLEH FAIRNESS IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v23i3.2859Keywords:
Perceived System Knowledge, Performance Appraisal, Fairness In Performance Appraisal, Job Satisfaction, KPIAbstract
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei pada karyawan Perumda Air Minum Tirta Satria. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pengaruh clarity of PA, understanding of objectives, acceptance of objectives terhadap job satisfaction yang dimediasi oleh fairness in PA. Jumlah responden dalam penelitan ini adalah 114 responden. Dalam penelitian ini sampel diambil dengan cara nonprobability sampling yaitu dengan teknik purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menggunakan kuesioner secara langsung. Sedangkan alat analisis dalam penelitan ini menggunakan Analisis Regresi Berganda Menggunakan software SPSS. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan analisis data menunjukan bahwa : (1) understanding of objective memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap fairness in PA (2) clarity of PA memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap fairness in PA (3) variabel acceptance of objective berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap fairness in PA (4) fairness in PA memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap job satisfaction
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Cappelli, P., & Conyon, M. (2007). What Do Performance Appraisals Do?. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 71.
Chusminah. (2018). Pengaruh Persepsi Keadilan Terhadap Kepuasan Penilaian Kinerja : Studi Kasus Pada Sebuah Yayasan Pendidikan Islam di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT Vol.3, 273–286.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A Due Process Metaphor for Performance Appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior 14, 129-177.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21 Update PLS Regresi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (2006). Organisasi : Perilaku, Struktur dan Proses. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work. Prentice Hall.
Gupta, V., & Kumar, S. (2013). Impact of performance appraisal justice on employee engagement: a study of Indian professionals. Employee Relation 35, 61-78.
Ikramullah, M., Shah, B., Hassan, F. S., Zaman, T., & Khan, H. (2011). Fairness Perceptions of Performance Appraisal System: An Empirical Study of Civil Servants in District Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 21.
Kartikadewi, A., Purnomo, R., & Indiyastuti, D. (2018). The influence of participation and perceived system knowledge on perceived performance appraisal fairness. Performance Volume 25, 36-44.
Kavanagh, P., Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2007). Understanding performance appraisal fairness. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 132-150.
Levy, P., & Williams, J. (1998). The Role of Perceived System Knowledge in Predicting Appraisal Reactions, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Vol. 19, 53-65.
Naji, A., Leclerc, A., & Mansour, J. B. (2015). Performance Appraisal System and Employee Satisfaction: The role of trust towards supervisors. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 40-53.
Narcisse, S., & Harcourt, M. (2008). Employee fairness perceptions of performance appraisal: a Saint Lucian case study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management Vol 19, 1152-1169.
Rivai, V. (2005). Performance Appraisal : Sistem Yang Tepat Untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahaan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rubel, M. B., & Kee, D. M. (2015). Perceived Fairness of Performance Appraisal, Promotion Opportunity and Nurses Turnover Intention: The Role of Organizational Commitment. Asian Social Science, 183-197.
Schuler, R. (1996). Human Resource Management: Positioning for the 21st Century 6th Edition. New York: West Publishing Company.
Soo Oh, S., & Lewis, G. (2009). Can Performance Appraisal Systems Inspire Intrinsically Motivated Employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration 29(2), 158-167.
Soper, D. (2021). Sobel Test Calculator for the Significance of Mediation. Retrieved from Free Statistics Calculators : https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/
Sudin, S. (2011). Fairness of and Satisfaction With Performance Appraisal Process. Journal of Global Management, Global Research Agency, Vol. 2(1), 66-83.
Suliyanto. (2011). Applied economics: Theory & Application with SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Suliyanto. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk Skripsi, Tesis & Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Swiercz, P., Bryan, N., Eagle, B., Bizzotto, V., & Renn, R. (2012). Predicting Employee Attitudes and Performance from Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Fairness. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 25-46.
Tang, T. L.-P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. (1996). Distributive and Procedural Justice as Related to Satisfaction and Commitment. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 25-30.
Toppo, L., & Prusty, T. (2012). From Performance Appraisal to Performance Management. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 1-6.
Umar, H. (2009). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Williams, J., & Levy, P. (2000). Investigating Some Neglected Criteria: The Influence of Organizational Level and Perceived System Knowledge on Appraisal Reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology , 501-513.
Zheng, W., Zhang, M., & Li, H. (2012). Performance appraisal process and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 732-752.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
