Studi Empiris Kurva Phillips New Keynesian di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v13i1.351Abstract
ABSTRACT
The present research was aimed to analyze New Keynesian Phillips Curve (NKPC) in Indonesia using time series data for 39 years, start from 1970 until 2008. We use generalized method of moments (GMM) for estimation and hypothesis testing for the following reason: GMM estimators can be constructed without specifying the full data generating process (which would be required to write down the maximum likelihood estimator). Price rate and unemployment rate were used as variables that will be estimated in this research.The result shows that all variables in NKPC estimation are significant. Inflation rate and unemployment rate have positive correlation. Our results tend to support the NKPC. Empirical evidence seemed to subsequently back up Friedman’s argument, as the 1970s saw the “stagflation” combination of high inflation and high unemployment that the Phillips curve relationship seemed to rule out.
Keywords: New Keynesian Phillips Curve, generalized method of moments
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).