ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT IN GEAR PUMP MACHINE USING LIFE CYCLE COST METHOD IN XYZ COMPANY

Amelia Putri Oktaviani, Judi Alhilman, Endang Budiasih

Abstract


Abstract. Gear pump machine 51-98P01 is a machine that is available at XYZ company, which functions as a transportation machine for raw materials from one production process. Because of its function, if there is a downtime occurs on the machine, production process will stop operating because the raw material cannot be flowed. Those problems caused a large amount of expenses that company should pay because late of production. Downtime occurs due to several factors, such as failure to components on the machine, age that has exceeded the optimal age limit, and the number of maintenance crew that is not optimal. To solve the problems, the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) method is used to determine the optimum age of the machine and the optimal number of maintenance crew using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) method. In addition, a calculation of the proposed maintenance time interval is also carried out to achieve a certain reliability value using a simulation of reliability improvement to see the effect of reliability on the total LCC. Based on data processing using the LCC method, it is known that LCC in 2018 is Rp1,333,195,316 while the optimum LCC is Rp.690,180,267 with optimal machine life of six years and the number of crew maintenance is one person. Simulation of reliability improvement that carried out on the gear pump machine components shows a decrease of  total LCC of the machine.

Keywords: Downtime, Failure Cost Life Cycle Cost, Maintenance Crew, Reliability


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhilman, J., Atmaji, F. T. D., & Athari, N. (2017). Software application for maintenance system: A combination of maintenance methods in printing industry. 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2017.8074719

Alhilman, J., Saedudin, R. R., Atmaji, F. T. D., & Suryabrata, A. G. (2015). LCC application for estimating total maintenance crew and optimal age of BTS component. In 2015 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 543–547). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2015.7231483

Enparantza, R., Revilla, O., Azkarate, A., & Zendoia, J. (2010). A life cycle cost calculation and management system for machine tools. 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering.

Fraser, K. (2014). Facilities management : the strategic selection of a maintenance system. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0010

Handoko, T. H. (2003). Manajemen (Edisi 2). BPFE Yogyakarta.

Javad Seif Masoud Rabbani. (2014). Component Based Life Cycle Costing In Replacement Decisions. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 20(4), 436–452. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-08-2013-0053

Marais, K. B. (2013). Value Maximizing Maintenance Policies Under General Repair. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 119, 76–87.

Milje, R. (2011). Engineering methodology for selecting Condition Based Maintenance.

Patil, R. B., Kothavale, B. S., Waghmode, L. Y., & Joshi, S. G. (2016). Reliability analysis of CNC turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data - a case study.

Rezvanizaniani, S., Barabady, J., Valibeigloo, M., Asghari, M., & Kumar U. (2012). Reliability analysis of the rolling stock industry: A case study. International Journal of PerformabilityEngineering.

Velmurugan, R., & Dhingra, T. (2015). Maintenance strategy selection and its impact in maintenance function A conceptual framework. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2014-0028

Waghmode, L., Sahasrabudhe, A., & Kulkarni, P. (2010). Life Cycle Cost Modeling of Pumps Using an Activity Based Costing Methodology. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(12), 121006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002970

Waghmode, L. Y., & Patil, R. B. (2016). Reliability analysis and life cycle cost optimization: a case study from Indian industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2014-0184


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.