Red, Yellow, Or Green: Which Colors Are Your Co-Operatives?
Abstract
Co-operative is a socio-economic institution which is the most appropriate for Indonesian economic system. Indonesia has the largest number of co-operatives in the world, however, they have not contributed optimally for the Indonesian economy. Co-operative trainings held by the government failed to improve co-operative’s quality, since those trainings were not based on co-operative’s real needs. This study aims to identify and map areas of action for future development of the co-operatives. Using modified Development Ladder Assessment (DLA) as a tool, 74 co-operatives in Central Java, Indonesia, were measured. Four dimensions were assessed using DLA: 1) vision, 2) governance and member engagement, 3) management capacity and business development, and 4) financial management. Total score for each dimension determines whether co-operative is in red, yellow or green areas. Red means poor, yellow means moderate, and green means excellent. Most of the co-operatives are poor in the first (vision) and the third (management capacity and business development) dimensions. The Co-operatives were also found to have moderate governance and member engagement (the second dimension). Finally, the result show that financial management (the fourth dimension) has been well-implemented. Implication of this study is that co-operatives are suggested to get appropriate trainings based on their color areas.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azhari, M., Syechalad N., Hasad, I., Shabri A. (2017). The Role of Cooperative in the Indonesian Economy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention Vol. 6 (10): 43-46
Bekele, L, Dagnu. (2013). Examining Effectiveness of Internal Control and Internal Audit Function over Cash Operation in Bank - The Case of Cooperative Bank of Oromia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) Vol. 4 (6): 1233-1240.
Canadian Co-operative Association. (2009). Development Ladder Assessment for Co-operative Enterprise. CCA Canada.
Creswell, John. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach Fourth Edition.Nebraska: SAGE.
Davis, Peter. (1999). Managing the Cooperative Difference (Mengembangkan Keunggulan Koperasi). LP2SI Jakarta.
Dessler, Gary. (2013). Human Resource Management Thirtheenth Edition. Florida: Pearson.
International Co-Operative Alliance. www.ica.coop accessed on February 17, 2019.
International Labour Organization. www.ilo.orgaccessedon August 26, 2017.
Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (Indonesian Ministry of Cooperative and Small Medium Enterprises). www.depkop.go.id accessed on February 17, 2019.
Morris, Altman. (2015). Cooperative organizations as an engine of equitable rural economic development. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management Vol. 3(1): 14-23
Okechukwu, E. O. Umebali, E.E and Ugeh Scholastica. 2016. Performance of co-operative societies in Delta State, Nigeria: A reflection of adoption and application of internal control systems. Business and Management Research Journal Vol. 6(5): 74 – 82.
Rahim, Samsul A, Nawawi, B., A, Othman, R. 2014. The Internal Control System Effectiveness in Medium Sized Worker Cooperative. Proceedings of Global Conference on Business and Social Science, December 15-16, 2014.
Sugiyono. 2012. MemahamiPenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Staatz, John M. 1987. The Structural Characteristics Of Farmer Cooperatives And Their Behavioral Consequences. Cooperative Theory: New Approaches ACS Service Report 18.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 25 tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian (Indonesian Act on Co-operative No. 25/1992)
Zeuli, Kimberly A and Robert Cropp. 2004. Cooperatives: Principles and Practices in 21st Century. Winsconsin: University of Winsconsin Center for Cooperative (UWCC).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.erjpe.2020.15.1.1535
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Print ISSN : 1907-6827 Online ISSN : 2620-8849
Indexed by :
Partnership with Professional Association: