The Effect Of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure And Good Corporate Governance On Tax Aggressiveness
Abstract
Tax Aggressiveness is a tax planning effort carried out by companies to minimize their tax burden which can be done legally (tax avoidance) and illegally (tax evasion) by exploiting loopholes in tax law (gray areas). This research aims to examine the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosures and good corporate governance which includes institutional ownership, independent commissioners, and audit committees on tax aggressiveness. The subjects in this research were manufacturing companies in the consumer industry sector for the 2019-2023 period registered on the IDX with a sample of 23 companies selected using purposive sampling. The data used in this research is secondary data. The analytical method of this research was carried out using panel data regression using the Stata 17 analysis tool. The test results show that corporate social responsibility disclosure and independent commissioners have negative effect on tax aggressiveness. Furthermore, institutional ownership and audit committees have no effect on tax aggressiveness.
Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Institutional Ownership, Independent Commissioners, Audit Committees, Tax Aggressiveness
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alkausar, B., Kawakibi, F. B., & Lasmana, M. S. (2021). Corporate Governance And Tax Aggressiveness: Agency Theory Relationship. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 11(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v11i1.15610
Bernhard, C. T., & Veny, V. (2024). Pengaruh Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit dan Rasio
Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Owner, 8(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i1.1813
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific sociological review, 18(1), 122-136.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of FinancialEconomic, 3(4), pp: 305- 360.
Kusuma, C. A., & Firmansyah, A. (2018). Manajemen laba, corporate governance, kualitas auditor eksternal dan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Tekun, 8(1), 108-123.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory, 26 (1), 75–100. Diambil Kembali Dari Https://Doi. Org/10.1108/09513571311285621.
Latifah, A. I., Das, N. A., & Maison, W. (2024). PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL DAN KEPEMILIKAN ASING TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR SEKTOR INDUSTRI DASAR DAN KIMIA YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. Jurnal Bina Bangsa Ekonomika, 17(2), 1113-1124.
Lestari Yuli Prastyatini, S., & Yesti Trivita, M. (2022). Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Kepemilikan Institusional dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Al- Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(3), 943–959. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i3.1419
Ningrum, A. F., & Napisah, N. (2023). PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN PENGENDALI, PROPORSI KOMISARIS INDEPENDEN, DAN KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK DENGAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI PEMODERASI. JAE (JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN EKONOMI), 8(2), 88-103.
Noor, R., Fadzillah, N. and Mastuki, N. (2010), “Corporate tax planning: a study on corporate effective tax rates of Malaysian listed companies”, International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 189-193.
Prasista, P. M., & Setiawan, E. (2016). Pengaruh profitabilitas dan pengungkapan corporate social responsibility terhadap agresivitas pajak penghasilan wajib pajak badan. E-jurnal akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 17(3), 2120-2144.
Hanifah, F., Widiastuti, E., & Najmudin, N. (2024). the Effect of Tax Avoidance, Profitability, and Leverage on Dividend Policy: Liquidity As Moderating Variable. Marginal Journal of Management Accounting General Finance and International Economic Issues, 3(2), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v3i2.913
Pradipta, M. R., Najmudin, N., & Jati, D. P. (2023). Examining the Causality of Six Measurements of Good Corporate Governance on Value of Firm: An Empirical Evidence From Firms of Jakarta Islamic Index. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 06(07). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i7-10
Raharjo, A. S. (2014). Struktur Kepemilikan, dan Indeks Corporate Governance Terhadap Asimetri Informasi. In Struktur Kepemilikan, dan Indeks Corporate Governance Terhadap Asimetri Informasi.
Sarra, H. D. (2017). Pengaruh Konservatisme Akutansi, Komite Audit dan Dewan Komisaris Independen Terhadap Penghindaran pajak. COMPETITIVE Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 1–22.
Siregar, N., Rahman, A., & Aryathama, H. G. (2022). Pengaruh Manajemen Laba, Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, Komisaris Independen Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. JIS (Jurnal Ilmu Siber), 1(3), 16–24. http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.
Suryaningtyas, & Sawitri, A. P. (2024). pengungkapan CSR, Intensitas Modal, Leverage pada Agresivitas Pajak. Jurnal PETA, 9(1), 28–39.f
Yuliani, N. A., & Prastiwi, D. (2021). Pengaruh Dewan Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit, Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v9i1.27573.Copyright
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.