Conflict Asymmetry: Antesedents and the Role of Shared Identity and Shared Context in Moderating Its Relationship with Group Performance and Creativity

Dwita Darmawati


This article discusses the asymmetry of conflict in groups, the factors causing them and their consequences. Value diversity is predicted as a determinant of conflict asymmetry while group performance and creativity are predicted as a consequence. This article also discusses the role of shared identity and shared context in moderating the effect of group conflict asymmetry on group performance and creativity.

Keywords: conflict asymmetry, value diversity, shared context, shared identity, group creativity, group performance

Full Text:



Amason, Allen C. 1996. Distinguishing The Effect of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making : Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Team. Academy of Management Journal. Vol.39, No. 1, 123-148

Brewer, M.B.,N. Miller. 1996. Intergroup elations. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove , CA.

De Dreu, Carsten K.W. &. Weingart, Laurie R. 2003. Task Vs Relationship Conflict, Team Performance and team member satisfaction : a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psycholoy, 2003 vol.88 no. 4, 741-749

De Dreu, C. K. W., Beersma, B., Stroebe, K., & Euwema, M. C. 2006. Motivated information processing, strategicchoice and the quality of negotiated agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90:927–943.

Dineen, B. R., Noe, R. A., Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Wiethoff, C. 2007. Level and dispersion Of satisfaction in teams: Using foci and social ontext to explain explain the satisfaction-absenteeism relationship.Academy of Management Journal, 50: 623–643.

Fussel, S. R., R. M Krauss. 1992. Coordination of knowledge in communication : Effect of Speaker’s assumptions about What Other Know. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 62. 378-391.

Hackman, J. Richard 1990. Groups that Work (and Those that Don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Jehn, Karen A. 1994 "Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict." International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 223-238.

Jehn, Karen A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly; Jun 1995; 40, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 256

Jehn, Karen A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly; 42(3):530-557. 1997

Jehn, Karen A. and Chatman, Jennifer .A. 2000. The Influence of Proportional and Perceptual Conflict Composition. The International Journal of Conflict Management. 2000. Vol.11 No. 1 pp. 56-73.

Jehn, Karen A., Rispens, S. and Thatcher, S.M.B. 2010. The effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3):596. 2010

Jehn, Karen A; Rupert, Joyce; Nauta, Aukje, 2006. The Effect of Conflict Asymmetry on Mediation Outcome: satisfaction, work motivation and absenteeism. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2006.

Jehn, Karen A., Rispen S., and Thatcher, Sherry M.B. 2010. The Effect of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcome. Academy of Management Journal. 2010, Vol. 53, No. 3, 596–616.

Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. 2003. Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. In B. M. Staw & R. I.Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior,vol. 25: 187–242. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Le, H., Oh, I.-S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2010, October 11). Too Much of a Good Thing: Curvilinear Relationships Between Personality Traits and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. 2004. Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2): 285–304.

Pelled, Lisa H., Eisenhardt , Kathleen M., and Xin, Katherine R.1999. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1 (Mar., 1999), pp. 1-28

Peterson, Randall S. and Behfar, Kristin J., 2003. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in group : a longitudinal study. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2003- elseivier.

Rittle, Dennis C. 2007. Value Diversity and Affective Conflict Reduction Model: Reducing Value Diversity through Servant Leadership. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable – July 2007. Regent University

Salancik, Gerald R. and Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1978. A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Jun., 1978), pp. 224-253. Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of the Johnson Graduate School of Management, CornellUniversityStable URL:

Schwenk, Charles, and Joseph S. Valacich 1994. Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on indi-viduals versus groups. Organizational Behavior and Hu-man Decision Processes, 59: 21 0-222.

Simons, Tony L. and Randall S. Peterson. 2000. Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000 vol.85 no. 1, 102-111

Susanto, E., Shaw Jason D., Zhu, J., Duffy, M.K., Scott, K.L., and Shih, His-An. 2011. A Contingency Model of Conflict and Team Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011, Vol. 96, No. 2, 391–400

Tajfel, H. 1974. Social Indentity and Intergroup Behavior. Soc. Sci. Inform. 13(2) 65-93.

Thomas, K. W. 1992. Conclict and Conflict management. Reflections and Update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (3), 265-274.

Tjosvold, D. 2008. The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29:19–28.

Wood, Robert and Bandura, Albert. 1989. Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Jul., 1989), pp. 361-384


  • There are currently no refbacks.