The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Ownership on Profitability and Firm Value

Esti Julia Irawan, Ary Yunanto, Retno Kurniasih

Abstract


This study examines the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Ownership on Profitability and Firm Value. This study uses companies in the mining sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2017 to 2021. This research uses the purposive sampling method. Based on the results of the analysis of panel data using EViews, it shows that: (1) corporate social responsibility has no effect on profitability, (2) institutional ownership has no effect on profitability, (3) corporate social responsibility has a positive effect on firm value, (4) institutional ownership has a positive effect on firm value. The implication of the results of this study is that mining companies can manage the company and in the implementation of corporate social responsibility in a sustainable manner that can have a good influence on increasing company value. In addition, the corporate social responsibility program also has a positive impact on the company in attracting investors to buy company shares which in the future will increase the value of the company.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Ownership, Profitability, Firm Value.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifulsyah , H. , and Nurulita, S. (2016). Analysis of the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance.

Buchanan, Bonnie., et al. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Value and Influential Institutional Ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance .

Brigham, Eugene F and Houston. (2006). Fundamentals of Financial Management: Fundamentals of Financial Management . Edition 10. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Indonesia stock exchange. www.idx.co.id

Chung, CY, et al. (2019). Institutional Blockholders and Corporate Social Responsibility. Asian Bus

Management . http://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-00056-w

Destya, Ramia, & Abriani. (2012). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance and Financial Performance on The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Telecommunication. THE INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION . Vol 1. No 5. Pp 296-300.

Fauziah, F. (2017). Bank Health, Dividend Policy, and Firm Value Theory and Empirical Studies . Samarinda: RV Library Horizon.

Fu, Liang., et al. (2016). Tobin's Q Ratio & Firm Performance . International Research Journal of Applied Finance. Volume 7.

Gujarati, DN (2007). Fundamentals of Econometrics Third Edition Volume I . Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hadi, N. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility . Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Haruman, Tendi. (2008). The Influence of Ownership Structure on Financial Decisions and Firm Value : Survey on Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange .

Harry. (2017). Financial Statement Analysis . Jakarta: Grasindo.

Heryanto, R., & Juliarto, A. (2017). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Company Profitability. Diponegoro Journal of Management. Vol 6 (4), 1 – 8. http://ejournal- s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting .

Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1976). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure . Journal of Financial Economics . Vol 3(4), 305 – 360. http://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v16i2.27

Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1979). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure . American Journal of Industrial and Business Management . Volume 5(5).

Jensen, MC ( 1986 ) . Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economics Journal. Vol. 76, No.2, pp. 323-329.

Jizi, MI (2014). Corporate Governance and Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from The US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics . DOI :10.1007 /s10551-013-192-2

Kansil, R., & Singh , A.(2018). Institutional Ownership & Firm Performance: Evidence from Indian Panel Data. Int.J Business and Emerging Markets . Volume 10 no 3.

Cashmere. (2016). Financial Statement Analysis . Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mulyani, E., and Sari, AY (2018). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital on Business Performance of Islamic Banking in Indonesia.

Nachrowi, N. Djalal and Hardius, U. (2006). Popular and Practical Econometrics Approaches to Economic and Financial Analysis . Jakarta: LPFE University of Indonesia.

Oemar, A., et al. (2016). Effect of Profit, Cash Flow, Company Liquidity, Firm Size, Leverage , Institutional Ownership and Managerial Ownership to Predict Financial Distress Conditions. Scientific Journal of S1 Accounting Students, Pandanaran University . Volume 3(3).

Pasaribu, MY, et al. (2016). The Effect of Capital Structure, Ownership Structure and Profitability on Company Value in Basic and Chemical Industry Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2011 – 2014. Journal of Business Administration . Volume 35 (1).

Putri, ZB, & Budiyanto. (2018). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Company Value with Managerial Ownership as Moderating Variable. Journal of Management Science and Research . Vol 7. No. 3.

Pilaradiwangsa, B. (2010). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a Business Strategy at PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk (BRI Regional Office Malang).

Gujarati, DN (2007). Fundamentals of Econometrics Third Edition Volume I . Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hadi, N. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility . Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Haruman, Tendi. (2008). The Influence of Ownership Structure on Financial Decisions and Firm Value : Survey on Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange .

Harry. (2017). Financial Statement Analysis . Jakarta: Grasindo.

Heryanto, R., & Juliarto, A. (2017). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Company Profitability. Diponegoro Journal of Management. Vol 6 (4), 1 – 8. http://ejournal- s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting .

Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1976). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure . Journal of Financial Economics . Vol 3(4), 305 – 360. http://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v16i2.27

Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1979). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure . American Journal of Industrial and Business Management . Volume 5(5).

Jensen, MC ( 1986 ) . Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economics Journal. Vol. 76, No.2, pp. 323-329.

Jizi, MI (2014). Corporate Governance and Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from The US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics . DOI :10.1007 /s10551-013-192-2

Kansil, R., & Singh , A.(2018). Institutional Ownership & Firm Performance: Evidence from Indian Panel Data. Int.J Business and Emerging Markets . Volume 10 no 3.

Cashmere. (2016). Financial Statement Analysis . Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mulyani, E., and Sari, AY (2018). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Intellectual Capital on Business Performance of Islamic Banking in Indonesia.

Nachrowi, N. Djalal and Hardius, U. (2006). Popular and Practical Econometrics Approaches to Economic and Financial Analysis . Jakarta: LPFE University of Indonesia.

Oemar, A., et al. (2016). Effect of Profit, Cash Flow, Company Liquidity, Firm Size, Leverage , Institutional Ownership and Managerial Ownership to Predict Financial Distress Conditions. Scientific Journal of S1 Accounting Students, Pandanaran University . Volume 3(3).

Pasaribu, MY, et al. (2016). The Effect of Capital Structure, Ownership Structure and Profitability on Company Value in Basic and Chemical Industry Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2011 – 2014. Journal of Business Administration . Volume 35 (1).

Putri, ZB, & Budiyanto. (2018). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Company Value with Managerial Ownership as Moderating Variable. Journal of Management Science and Research . Vol 7. No. 3.

Pilaradiwangsa, B. (2010). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a Business Strategy at PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk (BRI Regional Office Malang).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.