Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Performance aims to accomodate research articles related to management studies. We invite articles in all functional area of management, which mainly about (but not exclusive to) Human Resource, Marketing, Financial, Operational and Strategic Management. Our main purpose is presenting current issues in management fields to wide-ranging readers such as academicians, graduate students, and business practitioners.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. Our reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the high standards Review Process and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. 

Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review. 

Type of Peer Review Review Process employs double blind reviewing, where both the reviewer and author remain anonymous throughout the process. 

How the reviewer is selected Whenever possible, reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated. 

How long does the review process take? The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the reviewers. Should the reviewer’s reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. In rare cases for which it is extremely difficult to find a second reviewer to review the manuscript, or when the one reviewer’s report has thoroughly convinced the Editor, decisions at this stage to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision are made on the basis of only one reviewer’s report. The Editor’s decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the reviewers, which usually includes verbatim comments by the reviewers. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial reviewers who may then request another revision of a manuscript. 

Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers. 

Editor’s Decision is final Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

Becoming a reviewers for 

Distribution Policy

If you are not currently a reviewer for Review Process but would like to be considered as a reviewer, please contact the editor. The benefits of reviewing for Transport Policy include the opportunity to read see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to contribute to the overall integrity of scientific research and its published documentation.

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is scheduled to be pulished twice a year.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 




Copyright © 2013
Journal & Proceeding | Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis UNSOED